Unified Architectures for Remote PHY Backhaul and 5G Wireless Fronthaul (2017)

By Yuxin (Eugene) Dai, PhD, Cox Communications

Remote PHY (RPHY) deployment started in 2017 in some MSO networks. RPHY works well in deep fiber architecture; it puts RF modulation devices deep in the field, attached to the N+0 coax outside plant, while keeping MAC and higher layer devices in the center of the network,e.g., in the Headend or data center. One of the main advantages of RPHY architecture is the efficiency. By moving RF modulators closer to the customers, higher order modulations such as2K and 4K QAM can be used, therefore increasing the network efficiency. However, there are challenges for RPHY architecture. Besides the technical challenge of synchronizing RPHY and MAC, it also poses challenges on the backhaul network for RPHY. The communication protocol between RPHY and MAC is Ethernet at a rate of multiple Gigabit/s. To backhaul large amounts of high-speed Ethernet traffic in MSO’s access networks is a challenge.

Another deployment in the communication industry is coming 5G wireless network services.

Although most of the MSOs do not directly provide wireless services (not including Wi-Fi) to the end-customers today, many of them are contracted by wireless carriers to provide wireless backhaul and/or front haul services in their networks. The amount of data to backhaul 5G wireless is expected to increase greatly and pose a challenge to MSO’s metro and access networks.

RPHY and 5G backhauls are new to MSO; it poses big challenges to MSO’s access network.

To design a unified and converged access network to backhaul RPHY and 5G traffic and at the same time align with the MSO long term migration direction to passive all fiber access networks is an even bigger challenge.

In this paper, we first analyze MSO’s current access network architectures for DOCSIS andPON services, then discuss the options for RPHY and 5G wireless backhauls. We then propose two unified fiber access network architectures. One is based on DWDM and the other is based on PON, to backhaul RHPY and 5G wireless traffic.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

5G Backhaul/Fronthaul Opportunities and Challenges
By Joe Mocerino, Fujitsu Network Communications
Overlaying Mid-Band Spectrum Backhaul/Fronthaul onto HFC
By John Ulm, Dr. Martin Zimmerman, PhD, Stuart Eastman & Zoran Maricevic, PhD, CommScope
Cable and Mobile Convergence: A Vision from the Cable Communities Around the World
By Jennifer Andréoli-Fang, PhD, CableLabs; John T. Chapman, Ian Campbell, & Mark Grayson, Cisco; Ahmed Bencheikh, Praveen Srivastava & Vikas Sarawat, Charter Communications; Drew Davis & Paul Blaser, Cox Communications; Damian Poltz & Dave Morley, Shaw Communications; Eduardo Panciera, Telecom Argentina; Philippe Perron, Sylvain Archambault, Eric Menu, Géraldine Trouillard & David Lagacé, Videotron; Gavin Young & Bruno Cornaglia, Vodafone
Beyond FTTH - From FTTH To Fiber In The Home
By Dr. Yuxin (Eugene) Dai, Cox Communications and Wei Dai, Computer Engineering Department, University of California Santa Barbara
Modernizing Cox Communication’s Access and Aggregation Network Infrastructure for Remote PHY Deployment
By Deependra Malla, Cox Communications Inc.
Follow the Yellow Brick Road: From Integrated CCAP or CCAP + Remote PHY to FMA with Remote MACPHY
By Colin Howlett, Rex Coldren & Douglas Johnson, Vecima; Jeff Finkelstein, Cox Communications
DWDM Access for Remote PHY Networks Integrated Optical Communications Module (OCML)
By Harj Ghuman, Cox Communications
Cable 10G vs. Wireless 5G: Foe Or Friend?
By John Ulm & Zoran Maricevic, CommScope
Towards SDN For Optical Access Networks
By Dr. Eugene (Yuxin) Dai and Wei Dai, Cox Communications
Cell Backhaul – Building The 5G-Ready Network of The Future, Today
By Jon Baldry, Infinera
More Results >>