Cable 10G vs. Wireless 5G: Foe Or Friend? (2019)

By John Ulm & Zoran Maricevic, CommScope

There has been much hype around 5G in the wireless world for several years now. At the start of this year, the cable industry announced its own 10G vision. Cable 10G and Wireless 5G initiatives offer disruptive, revolutionary technologies that at first glance seem to be at odds. But when combined, they offer an evolutionary strategy with much synergy.

The cable industry has undergone unprecedented technology changes over the last several years. The introduction of DOCSIS 3.1® started this and was quickly followed with development of Distributed Architectures such as Remote-PHY (R-PHY); Full-Duplex (FDX); Low Latency DOCSIS initiative; and now Extended Spectrum efforts. These developments are all building blocks that are a part of reaching 10G goals. The paper will review these goals and what it means for the operator to achieve these.

Gigabit Fixed Wireless technologies are emerging to rival wired services. 5G will be offered across different spectrums with each band having unique capacity/distance tradeoffs. Wi-Fi 6® and CBRS have also entered the fray. Doesn’t this position Wireless as foe to Cable 10G? The technologies actually need each other to make a better system. The future high bandwidth, high frequency wireless systems need small cells with many access points requiring a low latency wired backhaul; and APs positioned inside the home/MDU and outside in every neighborhood for optimum coverage. Cable is ideally suited to support this backhaul and powering infrastructure. Meanwhile, Cable 10G can provide multi-gigabit capacity to the home’s entry point but needs a robust high capacity wireless connection for that final 100 meters inside and around the home to every mobile device.

In the end, we describe how Cable 10G and Wireless 5G/CBRS are much stronger together and are at the core of a next gen network evolution.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Overlaying Mid-Band Spectrum Backhaul/Fronthaul onto HFC
By John Ulm, Dr. Martin Zimmerman, PhD, Stuart Eastman & Zoran Maricevic, PhD, CommScope
The Broadband Network Evolution Continues
By John Ulm & Tom Cloonan, CommScope
Broadband Capacity Growth Models - Will the end of Exponential Growth eliminate the need for DOCSIS 4.0?
By John Ulm, Zoran Maricevic, Ph.D., Ram Ranganathan; CommScope
Collision-Free Hyper-Speeds on the Bi-Directional FDX Highway
By Dr. Robert Howald, Comcast; John Ulm, CommScope; Saif Rahman, Comcast; Dr. Zoran Maricevic, CommScope
Is Unity Gain Still the #1 Objective?
By John Ulm, Dr. Zoran Maricevic & Dr. Frank O’Keeffe, CommScope
Converging Wireline and Wireless Network Infrastructures
By Hugo Amaral Ramos, John Ulm, Zoran Maricevic, Ph.D., Jose Tavares & Claudio Albano, ARRIS
Preparations for Deploying & Lessons Learned from Deploying High Split (204 MHz) on I-CCAP, R-PHY, & R-MACPHY - High Split as a Steppingstone Towards DOCSIS® 4.0
By Craig Coogan, CommScope, Inc.; Jamie Brown, Shaw Communications, Inc.; Zoran Maricevic, Ph. D., CommScope, Inc.
A Side-By-Side Comparison Of Centralized vs. Distributed Access Architectures
By Michael J. Emmendorfer, Thomas J. Cloonan, John Ulm, and Zoran Maricevic, ARRIS
Network Migration to 1.8 GHz - Operational “Spectral Analysis” Measured in nano-Hertz, a 30-Year Perspective
By Zoran Maricevic, John Ulm, Craig Coogan; CommScope
Lessons From Telco & Wireless Providers: Extending The Life Of The HFC Plant With New Technologies
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Mike Emmendorfer, Zoran Maricevic, Frank O’Keeffe, and John Ulm, ARRIS Group, Inc.
More Results >>