Can a Fixed Wireless Last 100m Connection Really Compete with a Wired Connection? (2017)

By J.R. Flesch, Bryan Pavlich, David Virag & Charles Cheevers, ARRIS; Belal Hamzeh, Ph.D. & Dorin Viorel, CableLabs

For wireless communications, this is an unprecedented time. More licensed and unlicensed radio spectrum between UHF white space and millimeter wave mega-block partitions is being made available for commercial interests to invest in and grow business services than at any single prior point in history.

The FCC is balancing competitive access for both licensed and unlicensed exploits with innovative dynamic spectrum arbitration promoting shared access in the 3.5 GHz CBRS band. The spectral largesse across all bands has predictably drawn enthusiastic attention from all the major MSO and MNO players with service expansion (or protection) interests at stake. The 5G area of wireless connectivity at scale, 10Gbps speeds and millisecond or less latency has set in motion a burgeoning and perhaps somewhat preemptive set of wireless test trials aimed at establishing both technical merit and posturing some degree of “best stewardship” of the public airwaves.

The use of millimeter wave spectrum has sparked many debates about its architecture and economies —given the physics restrictions of primarily requiring “Line of Sight” to deliver the promise of multi Gigabits of wireless delivery. It is this non-determinism of signal propagation that has generated lots of research, innovation, and testing of solutions to create and define a deployable architecture that will support both Fixed Wireless Access and mobility uses.

This paper focuses on the hot industry topic: can a Fixed Wireless Access solution be developed to compete with or augment the wired broadband solutions today? It will examine the available spectrum options for delivery of a reliable, high-bitrate wireless connection over the last few hundred meters of Front-haul as an alternative to fiber-to-the-home (FTTH). These are the cases where a newcomer wants to overlay incumbent, existing greenfield opportunities, or CAPEX considerations render the latter alternative unsound. Leverage of the best attributes of near-line-of-sight (nLOS), non-line-of-sight(NLOS), and line-of-sight (LOS) signaling will be examined. The opportunity to extend a hybridfiber/coax (HFC) plant by means of a wireless end network overlay will be analyzed for viability for the last 200m access to a home.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Why 6 GHz Standard Power Wi-Fi is the Game Changer for Residential Use in the US
By J.R. Flesch, Charles Cheevers, Kurt Lumbatis & Bryan Pavlich, Commscope
Cable 10G vs. Wireless 5G: Foe Or Friend?
By John Ulm & Zoran Maricevic, CommScope
Can Wireless Compete With Wired Access To The Home
By Kashif Shakil, Ericsson
The New Home as a Hotspot
By J.R. Flesch & Charles Cheevers, ARRIS International plc
Thank You FCC: Now We Have 1.2 Ghz of 6 GHz Spectrum so How Does the Cable Operator Utilize It?
By J.R. Flesch, Bryan Pavlich, Kurt Lumbatis & Charles Cheevers, Commscope
Rural 5G Fixed Wireless Access. Economics Analysis and Methodology.
By Sanjay Patel, Dorin Viorel, Ruoyu Sun; CableLabs
Comparative Technical Analysis for 5G Fixed Wireless Access Rural Networks (2.6, 3.7 and 6.4 GHz)
By Dorin Viorel, CableLabs; Ruoyu Sun, CableLabs; Sanjay Patel, CableLabs; George Hart, Rogers Communications
The Promise of WiFi in the 6 GHz Band
By J.R. Flesch, Charles Cheevers & Kurt Lumbatis, Commscope
The Future of Fixed Access: A Techno-Economic Comparison of Wired and Wireless Options to Help MSO Decision Process
By Jean-Philippe Joseph, Amit Mukhopadhyay, Ashok Rudrapatna, Carlos Urrutia-Valdés & Tom Van Caenegem, Bell Labs Consulting, Nokia
How to Finally Conquer Wi-Fi in the Home: Service Provider Style
By Nav Kannan & Charles Cheevers, ARRIS International plc
More Results >>