Evaluating Cable Network Inventory Methods: Long-Term Scenarios (2024)

By Steve Condra, Teleste Intercept; Arttu Purmonen, Teleste Corporation

Accurate cable network inventory information, including device configurations and network topology data, is crucial for the efficient operation and management of modern telecommunication networks. This data impacts customer experience, service reliability, telemetry, operational efficiency, cost management, cyber security, future readiness, and innovation. These implication areas are illustrated in Figure 1.

Discrepancies in inventory data can lead to service outages and negatively impact customer satisfaction, resulting in revenue loss (Torrente et al., 2021). Reliable inventories ensure that service changes and network upgrades are based on accurate data, reducing interruptions and enhancing customer satisfaction.

Network operators must optimize their capital investments by managing inventory and configuration information accurately, comprehensively, and cost-effectively. While collecting data about physical network assets may seem straightforward, the dynamic nature of today's networks complicates this task.

Consequently, inaccurate and incomplete records of inventory and configuration data hinder operators from optimizing their networks (Sundelin, 2017; Torrente et al., 2021).

Maintaining an accurate cable network inventory can significantly enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs. Sundelin (2017) highlights that virtualization and the introduction of software-defined networking (SDN) add complexity to network management, necessitating sophisticated assurance capabilities that encompass both physical and virtual resources in real-time. Effective inventory management supports these capabilities by providing up-to-date information on network assets, facilitating better resource allocation, and minimizing redundant expenditures. Similarly, Torrente et al.

(2021) discuss the inefficiencies and costs associated with discrepancies between network inventories and the actual state of the network.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Tackling Upstream Ingress and CPD Issues in High Split Cable Networks
By Claus Lassen, HFC Networks; Steve Condra, Teleste Intercept; Arttu Purmonen, Teleste Corporation; Pekka Hilke, Teleste Corporation; Niko Suo-Heikki, Teleste Corporation; Henri Aittomaa, Teleste Corporation
2023
Extended Spectrum DOCSIS: A Pragmatic Approach
By Steve Condra, Teleste Intercept LLC; Kari Maki & Arttu Purmonen, Teleste Corporation
2019
Coherent PON Poised to Become Cable’s Next Long Term Evolution Access Platform
By Zhensheng (Steve) Jia, Ph.D., L. Alberto Campos, Ph.D, Haipeng Zhang, Ph.D., Chris Stengrim, Curtis Knittle, Ph.D.; CableLabs
2022
Long Term Compatibility
By Vito Brugliera, Zenith Electronics Corporation
1994
Managing the Coronavirus Bandwidth Surge: How to Cope with the Spikes and Long-term Growth
By John Ulm & Dr. Thomas Cloonan, CommScope
2020
Proactive Network Maintenance Evolution to the Optical Domain in Coherent Optics
By L. Alberto Campos, Ph.D. & Zhensheng (Steve) Jia, Ph.D., CableLabs & Larry Wolcott, Comcast
2018
Technical Eye Opener- Cable Amplifier Powering Methods
By I. Switzer, P. Eng., Maclean-Hunter Cable TV Limited
1970
Lab Test Methods For Comparison Of Corrosion Protection Products
By Chris Holland, Tom Klopack And Don Costa, Raychem Corporation
1987
FDX & D3.1 Capacity Scenarios
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs
2018
Fiber Optic Cable Construction And Installation
By Sanford D. Lyons , Sales Engineering Manager, Siecor Corporation
1988
More Results >>