The Next Evolution in Cable: Converged, Distributed and Virtualized Access Network (2015)

By Jorge D. Salinger, VP, Access Architecture, Comcast Cable

As Cable operators are venturing into multiple access technologies, it has become quite clear that the next frontier in our industry is to evolve towards a Distributed Architecture. Whether that is by distributing just the PHY, or distributing both MAC and PHY, the trend is quite clear from both vendors and operators. This trend is intractably linked to two additional evolutions: Convergence of the various access technologies, and Virtualization of certain access network functions.

This paper will begin by outlining why and how the migration to a Distributed Architecture is necessary and beneficial. The paper will then expand into features that can be implemented with Distributed Architectures, and some of the resulting possibilities. Finally, this paper will discuss the topics of Convergence and Virtualization, and how these additional evolutions relate to each other, as follows:

1) Present why Distributed Architectures are useful, which would cover the following key benefits:

  • HE density increase, which is becoming critical as MSOs are segmenting service groups more and more, including moving towards fiber deep and passive networks

  • HFC network performance improvements by migrating to digital transport, especially as we move to DOCSIS 3.1 and would like to maximize the use of the higher order modulation rates that DOCSIS 3.1 offers

  • Trunk fiber savings as we move to higher capacity digital links that can be muxed much more than analog links, and

  • The ability to eventually virtualize the remaining upper layers of the CCAP

2) Discuss features that could be implemented in Distributed Architectures, which are not possible with the current analog forward and digital return links, such as:

  • Broadcast capacity replication

  • Multiple service groups per HE port

3) Present the concept of Access Network Convergence, explaining how a single network could be used for various access technologies, which will cover:

  • The use of Ethernet switches in the node

  • The use of multiple access technology modules in the node (RF, PON, etc.)

4) Finally, outline a network evolution strategy for services, and show how a Converged Access Network would make the evolution easier, including the Virtualization of Access Network Functions.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

The Next Evolution in Cable: Converged, Distributed and Virtualized Access Network
By Jorge D. Salinger, VP, Access Architecture, Comcast Cable
2015
Distributed Architectures and Converged Access Network
By Jorge D. Salinger, Comcast Cable
2016
Remote PHY: Why and How
By Jorge D. Salinger, VP, Access Architecture, Comcast Cable
2014
Converged Multiservice Access Platform
By Jorge D. Salinger, Comcast Cable
2010
Next Generation - Cable Access Network
By M. Emmendorfer, S. Shupe, D. Cummings, T. Cloonan Contributors: Z. Maricevic, M. Schemmann, B. Dawson, V. Mutalik, J.Howe, A. Al-Banna,and F. O'Keeffe, ARRIS
2011
Next Generation Access Architecture Options For Additional Upstream And Downstream Transmission On HFC
By Jorge D. Salinger, Comcast Cable
2011
Converged Multi Access Networks
By Amit Singh, Cisco Systems; Eric D. Heaton, Intel Systems, Inc.
2018
Delivering Seamless Subscriber Aware Services over Heterogeneous Access Networks using a SDN and NFV Framework
By Nagesh Nandiraju Ph.D., Yiu Lee and Jorge Salinger, Comcast Cable
2015
An Architecture for Distributed EPON Access
By Kevin A. Noll, Tibit Communications; Steve Burroughs & Brionna Lopez, Cablelabs
2017
Next Generation Cable Network Architecture
By Stephen D. Dukes, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
1993
More Results >>