Automation in a Service Provider Brownfield Network (2024)

By Mark Kayser, Cox Communications

Service Providers face ever increasing levels of complexity in their networks to accommodate more advanced services for their customers. The management of once fairly simple networks with just a few hundred or maybe even a few thousand routers and switches has become a real challenge in complex networks with tens of thousands of network devices.

Configuration errors and security are also major factors in network reliability. In the "Annual outages analysis 2023" from Uptime Institute (Lawrence & Simon, 2023), the leading cause of network outages was configuration / change management failures and many of those were due to human error. Making configuration changes to thousands of devices manually is highly inefficient, taking a large commitment of man-hours to complete. Network Automation is really the only way to perform this kind of change activity. In addition to increased efficiency, automation removes direct human interaction with the network devices thus reducing the chance for human error.

Another significant cause of configuration errors is deviation from the standard (aka golden) config. Even with automation, if a device has a configuration that is different than what is intended based on company standards, it can lead to a configuration change that causes an unexpected impact on the device. A configuration compliance solution is important to report any deviations.

In this paper, we consider four functional areas needed to create a complete automation solution:• Network Design – to create the intended network configuration• Configuration Deployment – to apply changes to network device configurations• Network Status – to provide live network status and an inventory of active network devices• Configuration Compliance – to verify actual device configurations vs the intended configurationsMost vendors offer automation solutions, but not all these solutions support legacy hardware or legacy firmware. This paper will look at an approach to creating a complete automation solution from a mixture of open source solutions and in-house developed tools, with connectivity to existing vendor tools that provides the flexibility to be customized for whatever equipment makes up the network.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Routing Packets in Provider’s Network: A Multi-Service Operator’s Perspective
By Deependra Malla, Cox Communication Inc.
2024
How Cox Communications Implemented an Expert System for Service-First Autonomous Operations
By Dave Norris, Cox Communications
2021
Modernizing Cox Communication’s Access and Aggregation Network Infrastructure for Remote PHY Deployment
By Deependra Malla, Cox Communications Inc.
2021
Cox Next Generation 400G IP+OLS Architecture for Maximum Network Optimization and Cost Benefits
By Saurabh Patil, Cox Communications; Jason Bishop, Cox Communications
2023
Deploying Segment Routing for PON Aggregation in Cox’s Metro Network
By Deependra Malla, Cox Communication Inc.
2023
Network Planning Automation Using Big Data
By Ted Boone, Jignesh Patel, Rob Ames, Kyle Cooper & Chaitanya Vasamsetty, Cox Communications, Inc.
2018
The Cox National Backbone: Building A Scalable Optical Network For Future Applications And Network Evolution
By Dan Estes, Cox Communications and Gaylord Hart, Infinera
2008
An Optimal Approach To A Full-service Broadband Communications Network
By Reem Safadi, GI Communications Division
1994
Node Health Within Cox ACOE’s Service Health Framework
By Shane Yates, Brian Stublen & Alexis Hwang, Cox Communications
2021
Automation of the Best Practices used to Evaluate 802.11 Access Network
By David Brownell & Salman Naqvi, Shaw Communications
2017
More Results >>