Smart Amplifier Ingress Noise Localization: Leveraging PNM UTSC, Available Headroom Calculations, Network Topology, and Smart Amplifier Ingress Switch (2024)

By James Medlock, Akleza, Inc.; Robin Lavoie, Cogeco Communications; Bernie Cadieux, Electroline Equipment Inc.; Frédérick Plante, Electroline Equipment Inc.

Locating return path noise sources in a hybrid fiber coax (HFC) plant continues to be a challenge for cable operators. Traditional techniques that utilize various methods to segment the return path in the hopes of identifying the leg contributing to the noise can be both time consuming and have a negative impact on subscribers due to network disruptions.

Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) 279 [1] defines a standard for a new smart amplifier and SCTE 283 [2] defines an associated information model that provides monitoring and control functions. One feature defined in the standards is an upstream ingress switch. This is typically a threestate switch on each upstream input port, allowing the port to be configured as “on” (no extra attenuation), “off” (large attenuation added), or “-x dB” (specified attenuation added). By leveraging this feature, a remote application can temporarily adjust the attenuation of an upstream port while monitoring the return signal to determine if there is any change to observed ingress. By systematically traversing the network, it is possible to isolate the source of ingress to a specific amplifier leg.

The concept of an upstream ingress switch adjusting attenuation is not new to the industry and more commonly has been referred to as a “wink” switch. While in North America wink switches are not commonly deployed, there are some operators in Canada and Europe that have deployed wink switch functionality through standalone devices installed in the HFC network, or as add-on devices integrated into legacy amplifiers. These environments provide examples of how an end-to-end solution can operate once smart amplifiers are deployed and the function is more widely available. Additionally, some remote physical layer devices (RPDs) also support temporary ingress attenuation on each return port, providing yet another isolation point.

In this paper we will discuss leveraging the integration of proactive network maintenance (PNM)upstream triggered spectrum capture (UTSC), automated impairment detection, HFC plant topology data, and ingress switching to localize ingress noise events. We will discuss the challenges of implementing such a solution when considering intermittent and short-lived noise bursts, HFC plant topology discoveries, and the impact on cable modems related to available transmit headroom. Finally, we will look at the status of each component required to implement an end-to-end solution and any alternative solutions available using existing equipment.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Data Collection, Interpretation Methodologies, and Challenges for Proactive Network Maintenance
By James Medlock, Akleza, Inc.; Ron Hranac, SCTE; Allen Maharaj, Rogers; Alexander Podarevsky, Promptlink Communications; Jason Rupe, CableLabs; Foad Towfiq, Promptlink Communications; Brady Volpe, Volpe Firm
2023
Upstream Triggered Spectrum Capture
By Allen Maharaj, Rogers Communications; James Medlock, Akleza, INC
2023
SCTE Smart Amplifier Project - Extend Proactive Network Maintenance to the Outside Plant
By Doug Jones, CableLabs
2022
Characterizing Network Problems Using DOCSIS® 3.1 OFDM RxMER Per Subcarrier Data
By Ron Hranac, Cisco Systems; James Medlock, Akleza,Inc.; Bruce Currivan, JJP Development; Roger Fish & Tom Kolze, Broadcom; Jason Rupe & Tom Williams, CableLabs; Larry Wolcott, Comcast
2019
Understanding The Challenges of DOCSIS Proactive Network Maintenance
By Allen Maharaj, Rogers Communications; Jason Rupe, Cablelabs; Alexander Podarevsky, Promptlink Communications; Foad Towfiq, Promptlink Communications; Albert J Kim, Rogers Communications
2024
Smart Amplifiers – Are They Worth It?
By Mike Darling, Shaw Communications
2022
How Will Proactive Network Maintenance Change Under DOCSIS® 4.0?
By Ron Hranac; Jason Rupe, Ph.D. CableLabs®; Dan Torbet, CommScope; Brady Volpe, The Volpe Firm
2022
Full Band Capture Revisited
By Ron Hranac, Cisco Systems; Chad Campbell, Intraway; Roger Fish & Tom Kolze, Broadcom; Even Kristoffersen & Aleksander Soeberg, Telia Norge; James Medlock, Akleza; Jason Rupe & Tom Williams, CableLabs; Paul Schauer & Larry Wolcott, Comcast
2020
Water Can Run, But It Can’t Hide: PNM Finds Soaked Cables
By Kathy Fox, Nathan Zedan, James Kolcun & Larry Wolcott, Comcast; Jason Rupe, Tom Williams & Jay Zhu, CableLabs; Ron Hranac, SCTE Network Operations Subcommittee
2021
Exploring the Benefits of Network Intelligence Applications to Optimize HFC Networks Using a Data-Driven Design Approach
By Diana Linton, Charter Communications; Esteban Sandino, Charter Communications; Nader Foroughi, Technetix Inc.; Keith Auzenne, Charter Communications; Premton Bogaj, Technetix Inc.
2023
More Results >>