Practical Implementation of Profile Management Application (2021)

By Brady Volpe, NimbleThis and The VolpeFirm

Speed. We never seem to get enough of it. This is certainly true when it comes to high-speed data. Over the past 20 years the data over cable system interface specification (DOCSIS®) publications have undergone several iterations to accommodate more and more speed. DOCSIS 3.1 introduced new technologies specifically to support even more speed improvements. Specifically, DOCSIS 3.1 introduced orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) in the downstream and orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) in the upstream. OFDM and OFDMA are unique in their implementation of frequency allocation because they use very narrow slices of bandwidth in the RF spectrum to transmit data, called sub-carriers. A single OFDM channel is made of many sub-carriers. For example, a single 192 MHz OFDM block can contain 7600 subcarriers. These subcarriers are only 25 kHz or 50 kHz in bandwidth. Contrast this to our traditional single-carrier quadrature amplitude modulated (SC-QAM) channel which is typical 6MHz (or 8 MHz for some non-North American systems).

Each subcarrier can have its own modulation from 16-QAM up to 4096-QAM (even high order modulations may be supported). Again, we can contrast modulation to legacy SC-QAM, which are limited to 64-QAMor 256-QAM. In the comparison of SC-QAM to OFDM we see a drastic difference between bandwidth (6MHz vs 25 kHz) and modulation (256-QAM vs 4096-QAM).

As previously mentioned, in OFDM each subcarrier can have its own modulation. This means one subcarrier can be running at 4096-QAM while its adjacent subcarrier could be running at 16-QAM. This is a very power feature when impairments are present because each subcarrier can be optimized to ensure modems can receive data from each subcarrier no matter how bad the impairment. But how could one possibly know how to configure 8000 subcarriers? It’s not possible. This falls into software called the profile management application or PMA coupled with proactive network maintenance (PNM).

This paper will explain how PNM and PMA work together to optimize the OFDM downstream and later the OFDMA upstream to maximize the data throughput in the presence of downstream and upstream impairments.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Practical Lessons from D3.1 Deployments and a Profile Management Application
By Karthik Sundaresan, Jay Zhu & Mayank Mishra, CableLabs; James Lin, Kyrio/CableLabs
DOCSIS 3.1 Profile Management Application and Algorithms
By Greg White and Karthik Sundaresan, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
Machine Learning and Proactive Network Maintenance: Transforming Today's Plant Operations
By Brady Volpe, The VolpeFirm and NimbleThis; Berk Ottlik, NimbleThis LLC
Top-5 Things You Should Know About Operating a Virtual CMTS
By Brady Volpe, NimbleThis and The VolpeFirm; Thuy Nguyen, Intel Corporation; Muhammad Siddiqui, Intel Corporation; Michael Lafser, World Wide Technology
Program Management In Implementation
By Ernest O. Tunmann, Tele-Engineering Corp.
A Machine Learning Pipeline for D3.1 Profile Management
By Maher Harb, Jude Ferreira, Dan Rice, Bryan Santangelo & Rick Spanbauer, Comcast
DOCSIS 3.1 Multicast Profile Management Mechanism
By Yanbin Sun, Tao Ouyang, and Hesham ElBakoury, Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd.
Field Experiences with US OFDMA and Using US Profile Management
By Karthik Sundaresan & Jay Zhu, CableLabs; João Pedro Fernandes, NOS
Profile Management Informed Proactive Network Maintenance
By Jason Rupe & Jingjie Zhu, CableLabs
Using Profile Management to operationalize the roll-off region in DOCSIS 3.1 HFC networks
By Diana Linton, Justin Stiles, Esteban Sandino, Roger Stafford, Vinod Dani, Jay Liew, Keith Auzenne; Charter Communications
More Results >>