Using Machine Learning to Automate Node Split Designs and HFC Augmentation Options (2020)

By Keith R. Hayes, IMMCO, Inc.

There are more than 300,000 HFC nodes in the US currently, and several million more worldwide. The additional network traffic triggered by Covid-19 in the spring of 2020 increased the level of HFC capacity augments by as much as 300% compared to 2019 volume. Network augmentation techniques such as node splits, adding HSI EIA’s (6 MHz channels), service group de-combines, bandwidth expansion, Node+0/RPD’s and mid-/high split reverse path expansion require engineering and operations resources in both ISP and OSP.

This paper will examine techniques in which much of this activity can be automated and iteratively optimized through Machine Learning (ML). With inputs provided from network mapping systems, capacity monitoring platforms, spectrum management applications, and business rules such as preferred augmentation hierarchy, expected duration before next augment, balancing of house-counts, municipal permitting difficulty, and cost efficiency, the ML environment would rapidly analyze entire geographic segments of the network, and provide augmentation planning data including network design changes and BOM’s for areas requiring immediate physical layer upgrades.

As the ML platform iteratively processes network geographies, it will learn from how past predictions tracked to current status and continuously adjust to optimize capacity augmentation methods and designs.

As the ML environment will be analyzing the entire network geography, data to drive Capex planning for future years will be derived enabling the operator to more efficiently allocate capital.

The ML environment would also support “what/if” network topology planning for approaches, such as bandwidth expansion to 1.8 GHz vs Node+0 at current bandwidth, and provide data on cost, duration before next augment needed, and percentage of network elements requiring replacement or repositioning.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

The Intersection of HFC and 5G
By Keith R. Hayes, Broadband Advisors Group, LLC
2017
Capacity Planning, Traffic Engineering, and HFC Plant Evolution for the Next 25 Years
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Frank O’Keeffe & John Ulm, CommScope; Ruth Cloonan, BlueOpus
2019
Applications of Machine Learning in Cable Access Networks
By Karthik Sundaresan, Nicolas Metts, Greg White, Albert Cabellos-Aparicio, CableLabs
2016
Embracing Service Delivery Changes with Machine Learning
By Andrew Sundelin, Guavus, Inc.
2018
Simplifying Field Operations Using Machine Learning
By Sanjay Dorairaj, Bernard Burg & Nicholas Pinckernell, Comcast Corporation; Chris Bastian, SCTE
2017
Network Capacity and Machine Learning
By Dr. Claudio Righetti, Emilia Gibellini, Florencia De Arca, Carlos Germán Carreño Romano, Mariela Fiorenzo, Gabriel Carro & Fernando Rodrigo Ochoa, Cablevisión S.A.
2017
Lessons From Telco & Wireless Providers: Extending The Life Of The HFC Plant With New Technologies
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Mike Emmendorfer, Zoran Maricevic, Frank O’Keeffe, and John Ulm, ARRIS Group, Inc.
2015
Adaptive Power Management for Node Clusters
By Fernando X. Villarruel, Michael Mobley & Curt Dalton, Cisco Systems, Inc.; Lamar West, Ph.D., LEW Consulting, LLC
2018
Toward Automated Intelligent Resource Optimization for vCMTS Using Machine Learning
By Kieran Mulqueen, Michael O’Hanlon, Marcin Spoczynski, Brendan Ryan, Thijs Metsch, Leonard Feehan & Ruth Quinn, Intel
2018
Operationalizing Streaming Telemetry and Machine Learning Model Serving: Customer Experience Automation
By Nick Pinckernell & Scott Rome, Comcast
2020
More Results >>