Using Machine Learning to Automate Node Split Designs and HFC Augmentation Options (2020)

By Keith R. Hayes, IMMCO, Inc.

There are more than 300,000 HFC nodes in the US currently, and several million more worldwide. The additional network traffic triggered by Covid-19 in the spring of 2020 increased the level of HFC capacity augments by as much as 300% compared to 2019 volume. Network augmentation techniques such as node splits, adding HSI EIA’s (6 MHz channels), service group de-combines, bandwidth expansion, Node+0/RPD’s and mid-/high split reverse path expansion require engineering and operations resources in both ISP and OSP.

This paper will examine techniques in which much of this activity can be automated and iteratively optimized through Machine Learning (ML). With inputs provided from network mapping systems, capacity monitoring platforms, spectrum management applications, and business rules such as preferred augmentation hierarchy, expected duration before next augment, balancing of house-counts, municipal permitting difficulty, and cost efficiency, the ML environment would rapidly analyze entire geographic segments of the network, and provide augmentation planning data including network design changes and BOM’s for areas requiring immediate physical layer upgrades.

As the ML platform iteratively processes network geographies, it will learn from how past predictions tracked to current status and continuously adjust to optimize capacity augmentation methods and designs.

As the ML environment will be analyzing the entire network geography, data to drive Capex planning for future years will be derived enabling the operator to more efficiently allocate capital.

The ML environment would also support “what/if” network topology planning for approaches, such as bandwidth expansion to 1.8 GHz vs Node+0 at current bandwidth, and provide data on cost, duration before next augment needed, and percentage of network elements requiring replacement or repositioning.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Preparations for Deploying & Lessons Learned from Deploying High Split (204 MHz) on I-CCAP, R-PHY, & R-MACPHY - High Split as a Steppingstone Towards DOCSIS® 4.0
By Craig Coogan, CommScope, Inc.; Jamie Brown, Shaw Communications, Inc.; Zoran Maricevic, Ph. D., CommScope, Inc.
Exploring the Benefits of Network Intelligence Applications to Optimize HFC Networks Using a Data-Driven Design Approach
By Diana Linton, Charter Communications; Esteban Sandino, Charter Communications; Nader Foroughi, Technetix Inc.; Keith Auzenne, Charter Communications; Premton Bogaj, Technetix Inc.
The Intersection of HFC and 5G
By Keith R. Hayes, Broadband Advisors Group, LLC
Capacity Planning, Traffic Engineering, and HFC Plant Evolution for the Next 25 Years
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Frank O’Keeffe & John Ulm, CommScope; Ruth Cloonan, BlueOpus
Lessons From Telco & Wireless Providers: Extending The Life Of The HFC Plant With New Technologies
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Mike Emmendorfer, Zoran Maricevic, Frank O’Keeffe, and John Ulm, ARRIS Group, Inc.
Applications of Machine Learning in Cable Access Networks
By Karthik Sundaresan, Nicolas Metts, Greg White, Albert Cabellos-Aparicio, CableLabs
Embracing Service Delivery Changes with Machine Learning
By Andrew Sundelin, Guavus, Inc.
Simplifying Field Operations Using Machine Learning
By Sanjay Dorairaj, Bernard Burg & Nicholas Pinckernell, Comcast Corporation; Chris Bastian, SCTE
Network Capacity and Machine Learning
By Dr. Claudio Righetti, Emilia Gibellini, Florencia De Arca, Carlos Germán Carreño Romano, Mariela Fiorenzo, Gabriel Carro & Fernando Rodrigo Ochoa, Cablevisión S.A.
Machine Learning Model for Customer Claim Prediction in HFC Subscribers
By Dr. Claudio Righetti, Telecom Argentina S.A.; Matilde Cuenca, Telecom Argentina S.A.; Dr. Diego Martinez Heimann, Telecom Argentina S.A.
More Results >>