Leakage in a High Split World: Detecting and Measuring Upstream Leakage Levels in a One Gpbs Symmetrical High Split Hybrid Fiber Coax Network (2020)

By John Chrostowski, Benny Lewandowski & Dan Rice, Comcast; Greg Tresness, Arcom Digital, LLC.

System leakage monitoring is an integral and extremely important aspect of system maintenance. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) leakage requirements, test and mitigation methods for present cable systems with 5-42 MHz and 5-85 MHz return bands are well understood. Leakage signal sources, monitoring equipment, methods and measurement programs are all in place for measurements in the downstream band, 54-1000 MHz, with an emphasis on the aeronautical band of 108-137 MHz. The FCC sets maximum individual signal leakage levels for cable systems, with more stringent limits on cable systems that may interfere with aeronautical and navigation communications.

In a traditional cable system with a 5-42 MHz return band, high level signals in the downstream are present at the headend or node output, and at the home, the downstream signal is at its lowest level. What happens if you increase the upper boundary of the upstream signal path to 204 MHz or higher? The system is essentially turned upside down, with the highest signal levels in the aeronautical band (108-137MHz) at the home, and the lowest upstream signal levels at the headend or node.

This paper will look at the implications of these inverted plant levels. How do the FCC’s cable signal leakage requirements apply to this scenario? Can the same leakage tools and methods be used? What changes and considerations need to be made? These questions not only apply to high split plants with 204 MHz upstream, but also to future full duplex data over cable service interface specification.

(FDX DOCSIS) and extended spectrum DOCSIS (ESD) systems, each with upstream signals well beyond 204 MHz.

This paper will review these considerations and discuss the implications of the “inverted” plant. Different options and scenarios will be examined, and their implementation and feasibility evaluated to help readers ensure a solid leakage measurement program is in place for when these plant upgrades are implemented.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Leakage Detection in a High-Split World: Industry Progress Toward a Viable Solution
By Rex Coldren, Vecima; Michael Cooper, Cox Communications; Greg Tresness, Arcom Digital
Leakage Detection In Full Duplex DOCSIS - Identification and Measurement of Leakage Levels in a Multigigabit Symmetrical Full Duplex DOCSIS Network
By Benny Lewandowski, Comcast; Greg Tresness, Arcom Digital, LLC.; Jon-En Wang, Comcast
Preparations for Deploying & Lessons Learned from Deploying High Split (204 MHz) on I-CCAP, R-PHY, & R-MACPHY - High Split as a Steppingstone Towards DOCSIS® 4.0
By Craig Coogan, CommScope, Inc.; Jamie Brown, Shaw Communications, Inc.; Zoran Maricevic, Ph. D., CommScope, Inc.
Deploying PMA-Enabled OFDMA in Mid-Split and High-Split
By Maher Harb, Dan Rice, Kevin Dugan, Jude Ferreira, Robert Lund; Comcast
Execute The Upstream Makeover Without Leaving Scars
By Dr. Robert Howald & Larry Wolcott, Comcast; Leslie Ellis, EllisEdits
Rapid and Automated Production Scale Activation of Expanded Upstream Bandwidth
By Rob Thompson, Rob Howald, John Chrostowski, Dan Rice, Amarildo Vieira, Rohini Vugumudi & Zhen Lu, Comcast Cable
To High Split & Beyond: The New Frontier in Leakage Detection
By Kyle Hohman, Shaw Communications
How Will Proactive Network Maintenance Change Under DOCSIS® 4.0?
By Ron Hranac; Jason Rupe, Ph.D. CableLabs®; Dan Torbet, CommScope; Brady Volpe, The Volpe Firm
Bringing the Mid-Split Factory Online to Rapidly Produce Terabytes
By Serge Kasongo, Comcast, Field Operations; Dr. Robert Howald, Comcast, CONNECT; John Chrostowski, Comcast; Robert Thompson, Comcast
A Proactive Network Management Scheme for Mid-Split Deployment
By Lei Zhou, Robert Thompson, Robert Howald, John Chrostowski & Daniel Rice, Comcast Cable
More Results >>