Upgrading the Plant to Satisfy Traffic Demands (2019)

By Nader Foroughi, Shaw Communications

The majority of MSOs outside plant architecture (OSP) consists of N+X. As time goes on the demand for capacity and speed in both upstream and downstream grows. Along with that, the era of symmetrical services is approaching as competitive pressure arises.

Fibre to the premises (FTTP) can help to meet this capacity demand but it is extremely costly. Over the past few years, many innovative alternatives and technologies have been proposed to alleviate this challenge. Full-duplex-DOCSIS (FDX) was one of the developed technologies in response to these demands. Although this concept is revolutionary, it requires the MSO to upgrade the OSP to a passive(N+0) state. This is more cost effective than FTTP, but depending on the operator, area of construction and plant type (aerial or underground), it can be quite costly. Moreover, FDX can be challenging from a technology implementation perspective, as it requires overlapping the downstream and upstream spectrum from 108MHz-684MHz.

Knowing that coaxial cable has 6GHz of useable bandwidth (BW) on average, last year the idea of extending the spectrum from 1.2GHz to 1.8GHz and eventually 3GHz was proposed, which gained a lot of traction in the industry. This can present different approaches to upgrading the OSP, to satisfy the future capacity demands.

In this paper an analysis has been carried out to evaluate the achievable capacity in an extended spectrum network. Capacity estimates have been based on the field measurements taken from the acquired 2.7GHztaps. Furthermore, a cost analysis has been carried out based on capacity estimations in a cascade of N+4.

Based on the analysis demonstrated in this paper, 1.8GHz extended-spectrum-DOCSIS (ESD) can be a great alternative to both N+2 and N+0 FDX. It can provide matching through puts as N+0 and N+2 FDX, at a lower cost. This allows an MSO to rapidly deploy this technology throughout their existing cascaded plant, in a cost-effective manner.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

HFC Evolution: The Best Path Forward
By Nader Foroughi, Shaw Communications
2018
Shaw Communications IPv6 Deployment
By Darren Gamble, Shaw Communications
2017
Upgrading Coaxial Distribution Networks With Amplified Taps Exploring a Reliable, Cost-Effective Approach to GigaHertz CATV Plant
By James A. Chiddix and Jay A. Vaughan, American Television & Communications Corporation
1991
Disaggregated, Coherent DWDM Solution at Shaw’s Newest Cloud Datacentre Interconnect
By Michael Ting Wang, P. Eng., Shaw Communications Inc.
2019
The Role of Lean in Shaw: Our Technical and Operational Journey
By Noé Morales & Aston Fenby, Shaw Communications Inc.
2019
Automation of the Best Practices used to Evaluate 802.11 Access Network
By David Brownell & Salman Naqvi, Shaw Communications
2017
Operational Transformation: Modernizing Field Operations
By Derek Strauss, Shaw Communications Inc.
2019
On Plant Renewal Strategies
By Dan Pike, Tony E. Werner
1998
Blueprint for Mobile Xhaul over DOCSIS
By Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, PhD, CableLabs; John T. Chapman & Tong Liu, PhD, Cisco; Damian Poltz, Shaw Communications
2019
Capacity Planning, Traffic Engineering, and HFC Plant Evolution for the Next 25 Years
By Tom Cloonan, Ayham Al-Banna, Frank O’Keeffe & John Ulm, CommScope; Ruth Cloonan, BlueOpus
2019
More Results >>