RDK All Access (Networks): DOCSIS, DSL, PON and Beyond (2019)

By Marcin Godlewski, Technicolor

Global service providers are no longer tied to a single type of access network – DOCSIS, DSL, Ethernet, or EPON/GPON. Decades of consolidation resulted in a patchwork of last mile access, which necessitated adaptability – in the plant and in CPE (Customer Premises Equipment.) CPE built upon the Reference Design Kit (RDK) began with access networks linked via DOCSIS (Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification), and is evolving to be able to connect over a wide and growing fabric of access network types, from DSL (Digital Subscriber Line), typically used in telco plant, to Passive Optical Networks (PONs) used in enterprise environments.

As multiple access networks become the norm, a need arose for a common and unified software environment, so as to simplify network operations and optimize feature utilization, regardless of underlying network specifics. An advanced suite of WiFi security features, for instance, should be able to be added into a service suite, simultaneously and seamlessly across DOCSIS, DSL, and PON topologies.

That common and unified software environment is the RDK (Reference Design Kit) broadband profile, designated in this paper as “RDK-B.” With a common and extensible broadband software stack, operators can design their product roadmaps beyond the “speed wars,” historically relevant but arguably moot now, with the expansion of Gigabit grade connections. Featur development can focus on how to bring additional value to devices connected to the access network (again, regardless of last mile type), to differentiate the customer experience.

This paper overviews access network types and related abstraction layers within the RDK/Broadband stack to support them.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Predictions On The Evolution Of Access Networks To The Year 2030 & Beyond
By Tom Cloonan (CTO-Network Solutions), Mike Emmendorfer (Sr. Director), John Ulm (Engineering Fellow), Ayham Al-Banna (Distinguished System Engineer), Santhana Chari (Sr. Director) , ARRIS
A Comparison Of Centralized vs. Distributed Access Architechtures for PON
By Michael Emmendorfer and Sebnem ZorluOzer, ARRIS
Scaling of Current PON Technologies to Meet the CPON Goals of 100Gbps and Beyond
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs; Zhensheng (Steve) Jia, Ph.D., CableLabs; Kevin Noll, Vecima
Revolutionizing Access Networks: How TFDM Coherent PON Combines the Best of TDM and WDM PONs
By Zhensheng (Steve) Jia, Ph.D., CableLabs; Haipeng Zhang, Ph.D., CableLabs; L. Alberto Campos, Ph.D., CableLabs
Remote PON Network Performance
By Edward Boyd, Tibit Communications, Kevin A. Noll, Time Warner Cable, Saifur Rahman & Nagesh Nandiraju, Comcast Cable, and Fernando Villarruel, Cisco Systems
Migrating MSO FTTP Networks to a Distributed Access Architecture
By Phil Miguelez, Comcast
Understanding Latency across PON systems (With few comparisons to DOCSIS systems)
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs; Evariste Some, CableLabs, & University of Colorado, Boulder
Bandwidth and Latency Analysis of 25GS PON - An Overview of 25GS Passive Optical Networks
By Edward Boyd, Tibit Communications, Inc; Edward Walter, AT&T, Inc.; Fernando Villarruel, Ciena Corp
Fighting FTTH with DOCSIS
By Mike Darling, Rogers Communications
Network Migration Demystified In The DOCSIS 3.1 Era And Beyond
By Ayham Al-Banna, Tom Cloonan, and Frank O’Keeffe, ARRIS, and Dennis Steiger, nbn
More Results >>