Delivering QAM Video in Distributed Access Architectures (2019)

By Colin Howlett, Douglas Johnson & Kai Meisen, Vecima Networks

The shift from centralized access to distributed access architectures (DAA) represents a fundamental change in the operation of hybrid fiber-coax (HFC) networks. Operators are moving to DAA for a plethora of reasons including:

  • Radio frequency (RF) signal improvements by generating signals at the node
  • Evolve outside plant fiber network to an all-digital network to serve other Ethernet-based needs (wireless, Metro Ethernet)
  • Hub space and power savings

While the DOCSIS portion of the HFC network is the primary focus of this DAA transition, operators cannot simply replace other key services with a full DOCSIS system. Traditional set-top boxes (STB) still require video to be delivered as MPEG Transport Streams (MPEG-TS) over J.83 QAM channels and many operators require out-of-band (OOB) signaling such as [SCTE 55-1] and [SCTE 55-2] to control those STBs, provide channel maps, program guide data, conditional access authorizations, and remote firmware upgrades.

When DAA standards were first being created back in 2014-2015, there was an implicit assumption that QAM video would be controlled and processed by a single Converged Cable Access Platform (CCAP) Core. Evolution of the overall DAA ecosystem to embrace other technologies such as virtualization and an interoperable multi-vendor environment has greatly expanded the possibilities for operators and a primary CCAP Core for QAM video delivery is just one of several architectures that may be used.

This paper outlines the challenges in delivering QAM video using DAA and compares the architectural options available to vendors and operators with specific examples of real-world operator feedback as part of early DAA deployments.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Distributed Architectures and Converged Access Network
By Jorge D. Salinger, Comcast Cable
2016
A Side-By-Side Comparison Of Centralized vs. Distributed Access Architectures
By Michael J. Emmendorfer, Thomas J. Cloonan, John Ulm, and Zoran Maricevic, ARRIS
2014
How to Deliver Qam Video in a DAA World
By Karthik Krishna, Nokia
2019
The Next Evolution in Cable: Converged, Distributed and Virtualized Access Network
By Jorge D. Salinger, VP, Access Architecture, Comcast Cable
2015
Migrating MSO FTTP Networks to a Distributed Access Architecture
By Phil Miguelez, Comcast
2017
Delivering Seamless Subscriber Aware Services over Heterogeneous Access Networks using a SDN and NFV Framework
By Nagesh Nandiraju Ph.D., Yiu Lee and Jorge Salinger, Comcast Cable
2015
Cable Networks and Distributed Video Repositories
By Shahram Ghandeharizadeh, Matsushita Information Technology Laboratory
1997
Achieving Significant Space, Energy, And Cost Reductions With Future Virtualized Distributed Access RPD And RMD Architectures For MSOs
By R. J. Vale, Martin J. Glapa & Jean-Philippe Joseph, Nokia, Bell Labs Consulting
2018
Innovations in Software Defined Storage for Cloud DVR and IP-Linear Digital Video
By Stephen Blinick, Vecima Networks, Inc
2019
Hybrid IP-QAM Video Solutions
By Christopher Poli, P.E., Richard Moore, William Weeks, Motorola Connected Home Solutions
2007
More Results >>