Operational Considerations and Optimization of OFDM Deployments (2018)

By Christopher Topazi & Michael Cooper, Cox Communications

With the convergence of services to IP and the continued growth of bandwidth demands, the access network is stressed to greater and greater capacity limits, forcing cable operators to find the most efficient network configurations such that their networks are providing the largest capacity possible. Such configurations require the highest number of modems operating at the highest modulation order profiles in order to maximize the capacity provided by the networks RF spectrum. The introduction of DOCSIS 3.1 is one of the latest options for cable operators to optimize the performance and maximize the capacity of their networks. DOCSIS 3.1 provides a host of new levers for improving the bandwidth offered by the network. One such lever is the introduction of much higher order modulations than previously provided in earlier versions of DOCSIS. On the downstream, the DOCSIS 3.1 CMs and CMTSs must now support modulation orders up to 4096-QAM with options to support 8192-QAM and 16384-QAM. This is a significant increase over the limited SC-QAM modulations of 64-QAM and 256-QAM required in DOCSIS 3.0 and earlier, and offers as much as a 50% capacity improvement within the same spectrum.

With Cox’s initial DOCSIS 3.1 deployments, we focused on a few select parameters in order to maximize the number of modems running the highest modulations. These parameters included:

  1. OFDM channel placement within the RF spectrum
  2. Power spectral density
  3. Windowing
  4. Adjacent channel interference and profile bit-loading
  5. Profile assignment and MER thresholds, and
  6. Channel metrics for monitoring the network.

This paper will explore the approach that Cox used to select each of these parameters and provide some details on the performance we were able to achieve with these configurations.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

The Cox National Backbone: Building A Scalable Optical Network For Future Applications And Network Evolution
By Dan Estes, Cox Communications and Gaylord Hart, Infinera
2008
Upstream Noise And Bit-Error Rate Analysis Of An Operational One-way System Converted To Two-Way Operation
By Claude Baggett, Paul Workman, and Michael Ellis, Cox Cable Communications, Inc.
1981
Network Planning Automation Using Big Data
By Ted Boone, Jignesh Patel, Rob Ames, Kyle Cooper & Chaitanya Vasamsetty, Cox Communications, Inc.
2018
Fungible Virtualization Stacks: Refocusing on Optimization of Underlying Resources
By Keith Alan Rothschild & Guy Meador III, Cox Communications; Brian Kahn, Sea Street Technologies
2017
Unleashing Fiber Capacity by Jointly Optimizing D3.1 and RFoG Parameters
By Venk Mutalik & Brent Arnold Benny Lewandowski, ARRIS; Phil Miguelez, Comcast; Mike Cooper, Cox
2017
DWDM Access for Remote PHY Networks Integrated Optical Communications Module (OCML)
By Harj Ghuman, Cox Communications
2017
A 4.5 KM Operational Fiber Optic Communications System
By Frederic N. Wilkenloh, Comm/Scope Company & Dr. Marshall C. Hudson, Valtec Corporation
1978
The Grown-up Potential Of A Teenage Phy
By Dr. Robert Howald, Robert Thompson, Dr. Amarildo Vieira, Motorola Mobility
2012
Making Room for DOCSIS 3.1 and EPoC – Is your cable plant ready for an OFDM world?
By Phil Miguelez, ARRIS
2013
Guidelines for Cable Facility Climate Technology Optimization
By John Dolan, Rogers Communications Inc.; Daniel Howard, Hitachi Consulting; Arnold Murphy, SCTi; Ken Nickel, Quest Controls, Inc.; Dave Smargon, AIRSYS North America
2017
More Results >>