A PNM System Using Artificial Intelligence, HFC Network Impairment, Atmospheric and Weather Data to Predict HFC Network Degradation and Avert Customer Impact (2018)

By Larry Wolcott, Michael O'Dell, Peter Kuykendall, Vishnu Gopal, Jason Woodrich & Nick Pinckernell, Comcast

Proactive network maintenance (PNM) has become a cornerstone technology within the Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS®), providing tremendous benefit to cable operators and their customers. From adaptive equalization to full band capture, a rich and extensive data model exists to proactively maintain our valuable networks and reduce operational costs. However, due to the complexity, financial and cultural barriers, many operators have been unable to gain traction with implementing such systems. This paper will examine PNM capabilities, weather information, artificial intelligence, machine learning, operational practice and financial implications to provide a meaningful approach for implementation.

Physical networks that are exposed to the environment are subject to environmental influences which can affect their performance, especially, but not limited to, coaxial and HFC networks and also including fiber optic, satellite, and wireless networking solutions. This is due in part to physics and the simple fact that physical things respond to environmental conditions in predictable ways. Some of the most common factors that influence these networks are atmospheric conditions such as heat, cold, wind, rain, snow, humidity, and freezing. The core premise of this work is to correlate the predictable nature of weather and seemingly unpredictability of weather related outages. While it is generally accepted that these things affect the network, very little work has been done to quantify in an empirical way. Thus, having predictable correlation with faulty network elements allows for operators to proactively prioritize and repair the problems before they impact customers.

Further, by understanding the environmental influence throughout the life span of a network, better decisions can be made about design and construction. This allows operators to evaluate the true cost of ownership over the entire life of the network including support and maintenance, which are generally very expensive.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Proactive Network Maintenance Evolution to the Optical Domain in Coherent Optics
By L. Alberto Campos, Ph.D. & Zhensheng (Steve) Jia, Ph.D., CableLabs & Larry Wolcott, Comcast
2018
Using Historical Traffic Data to Schedule Service Interruptions for Minimum Customer Impact
By Jason Rupe & Colin Justis, CableLabs
2018
Access Network Data Analytics
By Karthik Sundaresan & Jay Zhu, CableLabs
2017
What Gets Measured Gets Done / What Gets Analyzed Gets Transformed: Analytics for a Wider/Deeper Network View
By Venk Mutalik, Dan Rice, Karthik Subramanya & Jon-en Wang, Comcast
2018
Can EMTC IoT Be Supported over the HFC Network
By Shengbo Ge, Cable HFC/CRDC CHG/ Cisco Systems (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd
2017
Managing The HFC Environment Using Cable Modem Derived Performance Data
By Rex Bullinger, @Home Network
1999
Simplifying Field Operations Using Machine Learning
By Sanjay Dorairaj, Bernard Burg & Nicholas Pinckernell, Comcast Corporation; Chris Bastian, SCTE
2017
Access Network Build Comparisons: FTTH, HFC Fiber Deep, And LTE
By Tim Burke, Liberty Global and Michael Eagles, UPC Broadband
2010
High-Speed Data Services And HFC Network Availability
By Esteban Sandino and Corinna Murphy, Engineering Technologist, Rogers Cablesystems Ltd.
1997
Management Aspects Of A Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) Network
By Gojo Strkic, Mark Chapman of Philips Broadband Networks Inc
1995
More Results >>