Mobile Backhaul Synchronization Architecture (2017)

By Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, PhD, CableLabs; John T. Chapman, Cisco Systems

The growth in mobile data consumption has been putting pressure on the mobile network operators (MNOs) to build out small cell networks. All this traffic needs to be backhauled to the mobile core. While traditional choices for backhaul focus on fiber and microwave, hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks have been making advancements. HFC is now being considered as a backhaul contender by the MNOs thanks to its capacity growth, cost efficiency and speed of deployment.

Traditional mobile base stations need to be frequency synchronized to guarantee handover performance, and this service is provided by the backhaul. In the DOCSIS 3.1 specification, the DOCSIS Time Protocol(DTP) was designed into the DOCSIS 3.1 specification to support precision timing from the CMTS to the cable modem (CM). This would allow a CM to provide backhaul services to a mobile base station for backhauling via the DOCSIS link. However, DTP is just one piece of the puzzle, as it needs to work with other elements of the operator network to provide timing to the base stations. This synchronization framework has yet to be defined. Furthermore, each operator network has differing levels of timing support in their existing hardware. This complicates system level designs.

In addition to frequency synchronization, Long-Term Evolution Time-Division Duplex (LTE-TDD) and LTE-Advanced features such as coordinated multipoint (CoMP) and enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) all require stringent time and phase synchronization. Supporting these features places additional requirements on the synchronization framework.

In this paper, we review the technologies that can support frequency, time, and phase sync. We propose several architecture options, discuss their corresponding deployment scenarios, and the implications of each option on operations, cost of ownership, and time to market. Finally, we make recommendations on the device requirements and identify optimal designs based on operator deployments.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

Blueprint for Mobile Xhaul over DOCSIS
By Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, PhD, CableLabs; John T. Chapman & Tong Liu, PhD, Cisco; Damian Poltz, Shaw Communications
2019
Mobile Backhaul over DOCSIS
By John T. Chapman, Cisco; Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, CableLabs
2017
Cable and Mobile Convergence: A Vision from the Cable Communities Around the World
By Jennifer Andréoli-Fang, PhD, CableLabs; John T. Chapman, Ian Campbell, & Mark Grayson, Cisco; Ahmed Bencheikh, Praveen Srivastava & Vikas Sarawat, Charter Communications; Drew Davis & Paul Blaser, Cox Communications; Damian Poltz & Dave Morley, Shaw Communications; Eduardo Panciera, Telecom Argentina; Philippe Perron, Sylvain Archambault, Eric Menu, Géraldine Trouillard & David Lagacé, Videotron; Gavin Young & Bruno Cornaglia, Vodafone
2020
Small Cell Traffic Engineering
By John T Chapman, Cisco Systems
2020
Network Convergence
By Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, Ph.D. & Bernard McKibben, CableLabs; Alon Bernstein, Aeneas Dodd-Noble & Elias & Chavarria Reyes, Ph.D., Cisco; Curt Wong, Charter Communications
2018
How DOCSIS Time Protocol Makes the SYNC Specification Tick
By Elías Chavarría Reyes, Ph.D. & John T. Chapman, Cisco Systems, Inc
2020
5G Small Cells and Cable: Realizing the Opportunity
By Dave Morley, Shaw Communications Inc./Freedom Mobile
2018
Experiment Results for Supporting LTE-FDD, LTE-TDD, and 5G Timing Synchronization Over DOCSIS CAA and DAA
By Yair Neugeboren, Greg Cyr & Chris Zettinger, CommScope
2019
R-PHY with Remote Upstream Scheduler
By Tong Liu, PhD & John T Chapman, Cisco Systems
2019
Impact of CCAP to CM Distance in a Remote PHY Architecture
By John T. Chapman, Gerry White, and Hang Jin, Cisco
2015
More Results >>