Accurately Estimating D3.1 Channel Capacity (2017)

By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs

The DOCSIS 3.1 specification fundamentally changes the nature of information delivery across the cable plant, and how the cable plant will be maintained and managed. The modulation order and FEC can be optimized based on actual plant conditions at individual devices. Devices which receive clean signals will utilize very efficient high-order-modulation across each of the subcarriers, devices with a degraded signal will use more robust modulation, all on the same channel. To manage this optimization the CMTS uses the concept of downstream OFDM profiles and upstream OFDMA profiles. D3.1 allows defining multiple profiles, each tuned to account for plant conditions experienced by a set of CMs.

Estimating downstream and upstream channel capacity was relatively straightforward for SC-QAM channels. But in D3.1, since the modulation orders of each subcarrier could be different and different across profiles, estimating the DOCSIS channel capacity is no longer simple. With multiple modulation profiles in use simultaneously, the capacity of the channel as seen by each CM may change instantaneously. The aggregate channel capacity calculation from a CMTS point of view with the different CMs using different profiles becomes more complicated and varies with which CMs and profiles are in use. How does one account for the NCP, FEC, PHY, MAC layer overhead and other variable factors in determining the effective channel throughput? How does profile definition, number of CMs, and heavy vs light traffic users on the channel affect throughput? The channel capacity affects how many subscribers can be assigned to use the same set of channels. It also affects traffic engineering and when an operator would need to split the node to increase available capacity. What is the reliable method for an operator to get a handle on the network capacity? This paper will present a framework to calculate the D3.1 downstream and upstream channel capacity accurately and answer the above questions and considerations.

By clicking the "Download Paper" button, you are agreeing to our terms and conditions.

Similar Papers

FDX & D3.1 Capacity Scenarios
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs
Practical Lessons from D3.1 Deployments and a Profile Management Application
By Karthik Sundaresan, Jay Zhu & Mayank Mishra, CableLabs; James Lin, Kyrio/CableLabs
Network Capacity Options on the Path to 10G
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs
Estimating Downstream Performance And DOCSIS 3.1 Capacity In CAA and DAA Systems
By Michael Emmendorfer, Brent Arnold, Zoran Maricevic, Frank O'Keeffe, and Venk Mutalik, ARRIS
Leveraging DOCSIS® 4.0 CM Backward Compatibility on DOCSIS 3.1 Networks
By Karthik Sundaresan, Cable Television Laboratories Inc.; Doug Jones, Cable Television Laboratories Inc.
Improving Upstream Efficiency
By Karthik Sundaresan, Tom Williams, Sheldon Webster, Alberto Campos & Doug Jones, CableLabs
Unleashing Fiber Capacity by Jointly Optimizing D3.1 and RFoG Parameters
By Venk Mutalik & Brent Arnold Benny Lewandowski, ARRIS; Phil Miguelez, Comcast; Mike Cooper, Cox
Understanding Latency across PON systems (With few comparisons to DOCSIS systems)
By Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs; Evariste Some, CableLabs, & University of Colorado, Boulder
Field Experiences with US OFDMA and Using US Profile Management
By Karthik Sundaresan & Jay Zhu, CableLabs; João Pedro Fernandes, NOS
Upstream OFDMA Anomaly Detection and Triaging
By Jay Zhu & Karthik Sundaresan, CableLabs
More Results >>